Question

The “Wobbly Economist” Frederic S. Lee argued that these quantities are determined by political interests of “going-concerns.” The 1939 Hall and Hitch report found that, contrary to classical predictions, these quantities derive from British firms’ lack of information and their sense of fairness. The Areeda–Turner test for the legality of these quantities uses AVC as a rule of thumb. The “limit” type of these quantities creates barriers to entry. (-5[1])Manipulating one of these quantities boosts profits on a complementary good in a “razor and blades” strategy. It’s (10[1])not supply, (10[1])but orthodox (10[1])theories assume that these quantities are [emphasize] not (10[1])set in a “cost-plus” fashion (10[1])but via “marginal (10[1])cost” (10[1])approaches (10[2])resulting in “stickiness.” (10[7])For (10[1])10 points, (10[1])firms (-5[1])with market (10[1])power are “setters” (10[1])and not “takers” (10[1])of what quantities? (10[1])■END■ (10[2])

Back to tossups

Buzzes

Summary