Question

A stringent reading of a theory of this concept seems to entail “zipping back,” in which the actions of persons Y through A become impermissible. Leonard Hobhouse’s distinction of this concept’s “use” and “power” aspects is replaced with a Hegelian “personhood hierarchy” in a paper by Margaret Jane Radin. Calabresi and Melamed distinguished rules of this concept and “liability rules.” A thinker qualified his theory of this concept’s “ingrossment” with the “spoilage condition” and the “enough-and-as-good” clause. (10[1])That thinker (10[1])wrote that “men enter (10[1])into society” to preserve this concept, (-5[1])but constrained its (10[1])creation with a “proviso” (-5[1])that was modified (-5[1])by Robert Nozick. (10[1]-5[3])The Second Treatise (-5[1])argues that this concept (10[1]-5[1])is acquired by (-5[1])mixing (10[2])land and (10[1])labor. (10[3]-5[1])For 10 points, Lockean natural rights entitle one to life, (10[1])liberty, (10[1])and what type of ownership? (10[1])■END■ (10[9])

Buzzes

Summary