Question

A critic of this framework’s “way,” Deborah Mayo, holds that her “severity account” better handles irrelevant conjunctions in “tacking paradoxes.” The Judy Benjamin problem reveals an ambiguity in this framework, whose synchronic norms include Bas van Fraassen’s (“FRAH-sun’s”) Reflection Principle. (10[1])In a book titled for this framework “or Bust,” John Earman formalized its “folklore” of “washing out,” its threat (10[1])by the old evidence (10[1])problem, and its triumph over the hypothetico-deductive model of confirmation. (10[1])In a field of epistemology named for this framework, gambling-based Dutch Book (10[1])arguments (10[1])are used (10[1])to (10[1])justify requirements like Jeffrey Conditionalization. Subjectivists in this framework (10[2])place no constraints on agents’ initial credences. For 10 points, frequentism (10[1])opposes (10[3])what approach (10[4])in which prior (10[1])probabilities are updated via an (10[1])eponymous theorem? ■END■ (10[1])

Buzzes

Summary